Welcome › Forums › Gravitation › Is Entropy a "property" or a "primrose-path"? › Reply To: Is Entropy a "property" or a "primrose-path"?

Dear Gyula,

Now, with my feet again firmly attached to the Earth, and

not at all attacking your theory, nor even proposing to fool

you into a chain of reasoning that could negate your

assumptions….

I propose that your theory be left intact, and suggest that

it is only the form of your formalism, your purely Calculus

treatment of motion that could stand a more statistical

flavor. When I listen to you say that the positions and

velocities cannot be determined and that the Laws of Nature

are non-deterministic but causal, I see the need for your

concept of motion to be augmented by the concept of “optimal

transport” of information(-entropy). I believe that

statistical laws are what Nature has; probabilities and

their flow is a start, but large collections of objects

need the concept of a “measure” and that the term “entropy”

is that measure. Here is another video that I think you

should be interested in:

I suggest that your formal treatment is most accurately

described as “analytic” and that Information Theory is

as Cedric says, “synthetic” and so general that elegant and

beautiful concepts are born-out-of this generality.

Sincerely,

Bill Eshleman